This records management session featured participation by several RMRT steering committee members, with Alex Toner (University of Pittsburgh) moderating the session and Hillary Gatlin presenting.
Anita Vannucci of Emory University emphasized the importance of knowing open/public records laws. She suggested prioritizing work with the people who want to work with you – and then leverage this work to advocate for additional resources. She has found it useful to look to her state archives for resources that can be borrowed or adapted and to find out what peer institutions are doing.
Donna McCrea from the University of Montana looked to the American Association of Registrars and Admission Officers Retention, Disposal, and Archive of Student Records (2013) for guidance. They created a RRS upon the directive of the Commissioner of Higher Education.
Hillary Gatlin from Michigan State University focused on records destruction. At MSU, the Director of Archives must approve records destructions, so they’ve developed a form that can be seen here.
Daniel Noonan from the Ohio State University reported on their general schedule and department-specific schedules. The Inter-University Council of Ohio developed a new schedule in 1992 after the universities were “liberated” from the state records management system.
Johna Von Behrens from Stephen F. Austin State University said an internal audit is a good means of identifying the risks of poor record management:
- records not appropriately classified and identified
- recordkeeping process not effective
- records (paper and electronic) not adequately safeguarded
- inadequate record retention management
- process not communicated
Mary McRobinson reported that Willamette University began a records management program in 2010, and because their archives staff had no bandwidth for this additional work, they brought in outside consultants to devise retention and disposition schedules. Their process was as follows:
- set up steering committee with stakeholders
- sent out RFP
- consultants toured campus, interviewed departments, developed retention and disposition schedules
- consultants also produced guidance report – current situation, implementation, etc.
- RM program is introduced at new employee orientation
- individual training of departmental liaisons is coordinated by RM program
Virginia Hunt from the Harvard University Archives said their RM program was established in 1995 by a corporation vote. They ultimately combined collection development and RM services. They’ve found web archiving to be an effective form of outreach.